
From February 2005 QST © ARRL
Tom Frenaye, K1KI
Director, ARRL New England Division
During the K1KI multioperator-single transmitter effort in the October
CQWW SSB Contest, we used one FT-1000MP without and one Mark V
FT-1000MP with the International Radio roofing filter. They were used on
several bands during the weekend. For the single operator November ARRL
Sweepstakes CW contest an FT-1000MP with the roofing filter was used as
the main radio, and one without the roofing filter was used as a second radio.
In trying to figure out what could be said about the radio’s performance
with the roofing filter, what stands out is what
doesn’t
happen. In the past
when there were very loud signals (S9+20 dB or so) on the band, we’d often
hear extra IMD products on our frequency, even if the loud signals were 10
to 20 kHz away. With the roofing filter installed, we just don’t hear them at
all, unless they are very close in frequency. Listening to other stations on
CW or SSB is less stressful without the extra noises!
When looking for a clear spot on 40 meter SSB, the radio with the roofing
filter is able to find more “holes” between the S9+40 dB international broad-
cast stations, and able to copy other stations that would not have been heard
in the past.
After the first Ten-Tec Orions hit the bands in late 2003, there were sev-
eral times when good friends with new Orions seemed to start up too close
to our frequency. It turned out they couldn’t even hear us. It became clear
that the performance of that radio was superior to the FT-1000MPs used
here. With the International Radio roofing filter, the situation seems to be
back to even again in the never-ending goal to keep up with the competition!
How The Roofing Filter Sounds
(or Doesn’t Sound) on the Air
terfering signals may be audible at all,
until the second one shows up and the
3OIMD signal appears within the listen-
ing bandwidth.
Enter International Radio
International Radio (InRad) has been
providing high quality selectivity setting
filters for years, and has now responded
to the need for roofing filters as well. They
have designed a (almost) plug and play
roofing filter for the Yaesu FT-1000MP
series transceivers with a bandwidth of
4 kHz instead of the stock 12 kHz unit.
The InRad filter has steeper skirts as well.
Note that this bandwidth will start to im-
prove intermod problems resulting from
signals farther apart than a 1 kHz spacing
(+2 in Table 2), and that is what we ob-
served. Note that the downside is that this
receiver will be sharp (barely communi-
cations quality) for AM reception and use-
less for FM. Fortunately, the MP series
radios have a second receiver that can be
used for these modes. Most serious con-
testers and DXers will be happy to make
that trade.
Hooking it Up and Checking it Out
ARRL Lab Engineer Michael Tracy,
KC1SX, has installed and tested a roofing
filter in two versions of the FT-1000MP
series so far—a Mark V FT-1000MP and
an early FT-1000MP. The first of these
versions require that two small wires be
soldered to existing pads on a PC board to
provide pins for attachment. Other ver-
sions have the pins already in place and
the filter can drop in. The filter module
includes an amplifier to compensate for
the filter insertion loss. Figure 3 shows a
close-up of the filter board, while Figure
4 shows how it fits under the chassis (top,
center) of the Mark V.
Before and after lab testing for both
radios is shown in Table 2 and the im-
provement is notable. Note that the filter
also improves a related parameter—
blocking dynamic range. BDR is a mea-
sure of how much stronger than the noise
floor an off-frequency signal needs to
be to reduce the gain of the receiver by
1 dB. Generally, this is less of a problem
than 3OIMD, but can still be troublesome
since it only requires a single out of band
signal. A strong CW signal that you can’t
hear can result in the receiver gain going
up and down, for example. While this is
not great, it’s usually not as bad as hav-
ing a 3OIMD signal right on top of the
one you’re trying to copy.
We have no clear answer for why the
results differ between the two radios
tested. It should be clear that the better
the original filter is, the less improvement
there will be. It is also possible that the
radio with the least improvement (an ear-
lier version) was generating some level
of 3OIMD response in the mixer ahead
of the filter. In any case, the filters re-
sulted in notable improvement in both
cases. The sidebar relates to the radio
with the least difference.
Manufacturer: International Radio,
13620 Tyee Rd, Umpqua, OR 97486;
tel 541-459-5623; fax 541-459-5632;
www.qth.com/inrad/. Price: $165.
Reviewed by Larry Wolfgang, WR1B
Senior Assistant Technical Editor
A friend recently gave me a 12 V, 100
ampere hour (Ah) gelled electrolyte bat-
tery that had been pulled from service in a
bank of emergency power backup batter-
ies. The commercial communications ser-
vice my friend works for replaces the
entire bank of batteries if one of the bat-
teries drops below about 80% capacity. My
West Mountain Radio PWRgate and
Computerized Battery Analyzer
4
The ARRL Handbook for Radio Communica-
tion
, 2005 edition, pp 17.41-17.44. Avail-
able from the ARRL Bookstore for $39.95
plus shipping. Order number 9280. Tele-
phone toll-free in the US 888-277-5289, or
860-594-0355; www.arrl.org/shop/.
main reason for having the battery is to
have a power source to run some radio
equipment so I can demonstrate ham radio
when I go camping with Boy Scout groups.
I needed a convenient way to keep the
battery charged and ready to go for week-
end campouts. I contemplated various
additional pieces of equipment that I
might need to safely keep the battery
charged and also be able to connect my
station equipment to exercise the battery
occasionally. I have used a small portable
solar panel and a Micro M + charge con-
troller
4
to recharge the battery after sum-
Commenti su questo manuale